Page 1 of 4

GNOME3.x

Posted: Sun Feb 09, 2014 5:13 pm
by dkeg
I couldn't resist ... sorry. Found it in my postimage collection - bauchspeck (blast from the past)

Image

Re: bauchspeck

Posted: Sun Feb 09, 2014 6:02 pm
by machinebacon
Thanks for the trip :)

btw, actually a nice looking setup!

Re: GNOME3.x

Posted: Sun Feb 09, 2014 7:22 pm
by GekkoP
Nice one.
Well, would you believe I was talking about GNOME 3 today at home and not in any kind of insulting way? I swear it's true. Didn't install it though.

Re: GNOME3.x

Posted: Sun Feb 09, 2014 7:37 pm
by machinebacon
I can't fucking believe it :D

Re: GNOME3.x

Posted: Sun Feb 09, 2014 7:45 pm
by rust collector
Nope, no way!

Re: GNOME3.x

Posted: Sun Feb 09, 2014 8:34 pm
by ivanovnegro
I thought, wtf, then I thought why not and here it is:

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-jfeA ... _scrot.png

Re: GNOME3.x

Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2014 5:11 am
by bones
OMFG LMFAO!

Image

Re: GNOME3.x

Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2014 8:08 am
by chilli
bones wrote:OMFG LMFAO!
Whoops! I have no idea how this got here.

Image

Re: GNOME3.x

Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2014 6:11 pm
by ivanovnegro
Who said we were against bloat? :P

Re: GNOME3.x

Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2014 9:25 pm
by chilli
Gnome 3 isn't actually that bad for what that box is (htpc hooked to the TV) but I mostly use Cinnamon as it integrates better visually (if still a bit clunky), with a fallback Blackbox install.

Edit- though I usually don't see the desktop itself much on that one.

Re: GNOME3.x

Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2014 9:47 pm
by ivanovnegro
Who else here sees the desktop as all we use to see is a browser and a terminal session. :)

Re: GNOME3.x

Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2014 10:13 pm
by bones
I actually cheated for that Gnome 3 scrot. This is a live DVD of Antergos (Arch-based) with Gnome 3.10. Loaded my Mozilla Thunderbird/Firefox configs from a flash drive, and gave it a test, to see if my opinion had changed, or it had gotten any better. Pretty horribly dumbed-down, maybe even more than last time I tried (3.4?). It was actually fairly fast, though, even while using over 400MB of RAM (!!!!!) idling.

Re: GNOME3.x

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 2:23 am
by chilli
My scrot actually does fall into "Look at my bloat, my bloat is amazing".

There's a crap-ton of cruftiness under the hood right now. It started as a quickie "temporary" Ubuntu install on metal since a friend was asking something I couldn't reproduce in a VM. To get non-jacked up tear free video I had to kill the Batman break Unity horribly to get Compiz working. So then onto Gnome 3 since she was asking about it, which I did use for a bit, then settled in with Cinnamon. When I can, I'm gonna back up my remote mappings and junk and start over fresh.

Re: GNOME3.x

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 4:37 am
by hhh
"Honey?!!? Does this shell make me look fat?"

Image

direct link

Freshly installed minimal gnome-session on sid. He likes it! Hey Mikey!

Re: GNOME3.x

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 4:50 am
by dkeg
well what have I started and looky at what comes out of the closets .... but how many can say its with bauchspeck! I know wux can. Come on wux, pull out one of those old scrots!

Re: GNOME3.x

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 9:36 am
by wuxmedia
dkeg wrote:...Show us your Gnom3 scrots...
^ I would, but they were all on ompload.RIP 8(
my /home got wiped out.
might be one floating around somewhere.

EDIT - Friggin' page break

Re: GNOME3.x

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 1:04 pm
by kexolino
I think I remember this breaking after just a few minutes of posting the scrot on dA. Was Gnome 3.8 on Arch

Image

Re: GNOME3.x

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 10:54 pm
by pidsley
[disclaimer]These scrots are ugly.[/disclaimer]

I do have some bauchspeck scrots, but not on hardware that could give me the full Gnome experience.

Image Image

I had the real thing running on Void for a little while:

Image Image

If I may quote myself:
pidsley wrote:I also don't think there is anything inherently evil about GNOME, and I don't hate it, I just got bored with the bloat. For its intended audience, I think GNOME is actually quite pleasant. I am not its intended audience. :)

Re: GNOME3.x

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 10:56 pm
by ivanovnegro
^ With the old forum color, how fancy, shit. :)

Re: GNOME3.x

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 11:18 pm
by ivanovnegro
Well quoted Pid, I think is exactly that.