euclid-wm
Forum rules
Post your scrot in the appropriate section. If the section does not exist yet - open a new thread ;)
Post your scrot in the appropriate section. If the section does not exist yet - open a new thread ;)
euclid-wm
This one didn't seem to get much attention when it was released; LinuxBBQ Stack, featuring euclid-wm (pre-Spring 2014 series). After trying it out for a couple of days, I find that it damn near perfectly suits my needs, OOTB. It combines many things that I like about other WMs, and the keybinds make sense.
- ChefIronBelly
- Approved BBQer
- Posts: 1044
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 6:01 am
- Location: Michigan
Re: euclid-wm
Interesting I may have missed that one, will have to check it out.
(1/1) Installing: LinuxBBQ...................................[69%]==============[/]
-
- Baconator
- Posts: 10253
- Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 11:03 am
- Location: Pfälzerwald
- Contact:
Re: euclid-wm
^ A good reminder to "try the untried," as Ivan would say. Each time I think I have found a great WM, and then I try yet another one, and find it more to my liking than the last one: i3 is great, but needs tweaking to make perfect (axe the title bars, etc.); catwm was too crashy; still very fond of herbstluftwm, larswm, monsterwm, echinus, but liking euclid even more than these. The minimalism of euclid is on par with a fb/tmux session, but with the benefit of being able to use X apps, of course.
- ivanovnegro
- Minister of Truth
- Posts: 5449
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2012 11:12 pm
Re: euclid-wm
I used that in my sig. Actually it was a copy from our great Wiki, the BBQ philosophy, the original author of our bible is maybe Rho. :)bones wrote:^ A good reminder to "try the untried," as Ivan would say.
Re: euclid-wm
The wiki is always a good read, and Rho is a talented writer, to be sure. So many lolz. :)
Re: euclid-wm
credit where credit is due: i don't quite remember which parts of the BBQ philosophy were written by Jules and which by me. thanks for the compliments though :)
All statements are true in some sense, false in some sense, meaningless in some sense, true and false in some sense, true and meaningless in some sense, false and meaningless in some sense, and true and false and meaningless in some sense.
-
- Baconator
- Posts: 10253
- Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 11:03 am
- Location: Pfälzerwald
- Contact:
Re: euclid-wm
Credit where its due, I have written most of the points there, and rho rephrased, while pidsley corrected it :)
..gnutella..