xmonad
Forum rules
Post your scrot in the appropriate section. If the section does not exist yet - open a new thread ;)
Post your scrot in the appropriate section. If the section does not exist yet - open a new thread ;)
-
- Baconator
- Posts: 10253
- Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 11:03 am
- Location: Pfälzerwald
- Contact:
Re: xmonad
xmonadception
All statements are true in some sense, false in some sense, meaningless in some sense, true and false in some sense, true and meaningless in some sense, false and meaningless in some sense, and true and false and meaningless in some sense.
Re: xmonad
Another one I'm liking a lot, will need to spend more time with it. xmonad in Cream:
Re: xmonad
^ looks really good.
-
- Baconator
- Posts: 10253
- Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 11:03 am
- Location: Pfälzerwald
- Contact:
Re: xmonad
And did you add the hask(h)ell to it? If not: happy configuring :D
it would be maybe my absolute favourite WM *IF* there was no need for the hundreds of MBs of dependencies just to change a fucking keybinding :)
it would be maybe my absolute favourite WM *IF* there was no need for the hundreds of MBs of dependencies just to change a fucking keybinding :)
..gnutella..
Re: xmonad
^ I did. Yes, that was a shitload of Haskell dependencies: haskell-extensible-exceptions, haskell-utf8-string, haskell-X11, haskell-mtl, ghc, haskell-syb, haskell-transformers. Yeah, I cringed a little.
- ivanovnegro
- Minister of Truth
- Posts: 5449
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2012 11:12 pm
Re: xmonad
Looks nice Bones and yeah, I got you boys on the haskell shit. But then we have spectrwm. :)
-
- Baconator
- Posts: 10253
- Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 11:03 am
- Location: Pfälzerwald
- Contact:
Re: xmonad
Aha, I see: xmonad (Haskell) vs. spectrwm (C). Much better!ivanovnegro wrote:Looks nice Bones and yeah, I got you boys on the haskell shit. But then we have spectrwm. :)