bauchspeck not a fan of systemd

Forum rules
We don't support installations in VirtualBox, VMWare, qemu or others. We ignore posts about WINE, PlayOnLinux, Steam and Skype. We don't support btrfs, lvm, UEFI, side-by-side installations with GPT or dualboot with anything newer than Windows XP.
Google your problem first. Check the Wiki. Read the existing threads. It's okay to "hijack" an existing thread, yes! If your problem is not yet covered, open a new thread. To get the quickest possible help, mention the exact release codename in your post (uname -a is a good idea, too). Due to the lack of crystal balls, attach the output of lspci -nnk if you encounter hardware problems.
User avatar
wuxmedia
Grasshopper
Posts: 6454
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2012 11:32 am
Location: Back in Blighty
Contact:

bauchspeck not a fan of systemd

Unread post by wuxmedia » Thu Apr 25, 2013 11:41 pm

how come gnome3 doesn't like systemd?
it runs only JWM (which is nice) or 'classic' gnome on fallback
i simply apt-got systemd.
changed the boot line to init=/bin/systemd.... gets to GDM then fallsback.

not a massive problem. kinda odd, no?
"Seek, and Ye shall find"
"Github | Chooons | Site"

machinebacon
Baconator
Posts: 10253
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 11:03 am
Location: Pfälzerwald
Contact:

Re: bauchspeck not a fan of systemd

Unread post by machinebacon » Thu Apr 25, 2013 11:55 pm

DId you sudo update-grub after editing the GRUB file?


Shouldn't be a problem to get systemd with Gnome3. Just don't install the mixed systemd-sysvitin package.
..gnutella..

User avatar
wuxmedia
Grasshopper
Posts: 6454
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2012 11:32 am
Location: Back in Blighty
Contact:

Re: bauchspeck not a fan of systemd

Unread post by wuxmedia » Fri Apr 26, 2013 6:47 am

oh.
i didn't make the grub file persistent.
I understood that to try it out one could alter the boot line 'just once'
iirc that worked before.
would making it stick, by doing as you suggested be better?

as i seems not to work, i won't right now.

as for the packages dpgk -l gives;

Code: Select all

ii  systemd        44-11        amd64        system and service manager
ii  sysv-rc        2.88dsf-41   all          System-V-like runlevel change mec
ii  sysvinit       2.88dsf-41   amd64        System-V-like init utilities
ii  sysvinit-utils 2.88dsf-41   amd64        System-V-like utilities
like i posted, JWM and fallback mode work fine, gnome shell refuses.
i'm using GDM BTW.... maybe somethings awry there.
otherwise standard bauchspeck64 ( I have upg-ed to latest gnome)
"Seek, and Ye shall find"
"Github | Chooons | Site"

machinebacon
Baconator
Posts: 10253
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 11:03 am
Location: Pfälzerwald
Contact:

Re: bauchspeck not a fan of systemd

Unread post by machinebacon » Fri Apr 26, 2013 11:17 am

Then it seems that your gfx driver cannot jump into the real Gnome3 mode, which is quite normal if you have an on-board gfx adapter...

What's the lspci for VGA?
..gnutella..

User avatar
wuxmedia
Grasshopper
Posts: 6454
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2012 11:32 am
Location: Back in Blighty
Contact:

Re: bauchspeck not a fan of systemd

Unread post by wuxmedia » Fri Apr 26, 2013 12:16 pm

Code: Select all

00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS, 943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:27a2] (rev 03)
Sounds like what happened with the cinnamon release. Which iirc was systemd...
On a side note,
Interestingly, I just installed boner, it needed nomodeset to display after booting.
Anyway spamming again. :-)
"Seek, and Ye shall find"
"Github | Chooons | Site"

machinebacon
Baconator
Posts: 10253
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 11:03 am
Location: Pfälzerwald
Contact:

Re: bauchspeck not a fan of systemd

Unread post by machinebacon » Fri Apr 26, 2013 2:59 pm

And IIRC both cinnamon and gnome need a 3D acceleration else they fall back to a 2D mode (kind of what compiz was doing in previous Gnome2 desktops), and I strongly doubt any connection to systemd (except if you can give me some keywords), no seriously I doubt there's a connection - even worse: Gnome3 and systemd are hard dependencies in certain distros - not in Debian. Please keep in mind that we sit on two horses, even with a 'full-systemd' configuration you still get sysvinit -- Debian, yes yes...
..gnutella..

User avatar
wuxmedia
Grasshopper
Posts: 6454
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2012 11:32 am
Location: Back in Blighty
Contact:

Re: bauchspeck not a fan of systemd

Unread post by wuxmedia » Fri Apr 26, 2013 4:53 pm

OK, with that in mind, I might attempt to go the other way, and install gnome from a systemd base.
See what happens :-)
"Seek, and Ye shall find"
"Github | Chooons | Site"

User avatar
wuxmedia
Grasshopper
Posts: 6454
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2012 11:32 am
Location: Back in Blighty
Contact:

Re: bauchspeck not a fan of systemd

Unread post by wuxmedia » Sat Apr 27, 2013 12:31 am

Let me rephrase that :-)
Systemd and my gfx card don't get along :-)
"Seek, and Ye shall find"
"Github | Chooons | Site"

User avatar
dkeg
Configurator
Posts: 3782
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 9:23 pm
Location: Mid-Atlantic Grill

Re: bauchspeck not a fan of systemd

Unread post by dkeg » Sat Apr 27, 2013 1:50 am

hey wux, w/o hijacking this thread, do you find bauchspeck to run hot? I notice I'm always hovering 50F as opposed to low to mid 40's.

Work hard; Complain less

User avatar
wuxmedia
Grasshopper
Posts: 6454
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2012 11:32 am
Location: Back in Blighty
Contact:

Re: bauchspeck not a fan of systemd

Unread post by wuxmedia » Sat Apr 27, 2013 10:57 am

hi Jack. 8P
i don't have a temp gauge installed.

seems that my twin turbines don't start up much.
you got me worried now 8)

on topic - the other installs seem to need vga=778 on boot, i know, that's depreciated, works though.
oh a natural systemd install (keilbasa) didn't like gnome3 installed either...

don't worry i'll be soon posting boring blog articles instead of spamming here, with my nonsense. 8)
"Seek, and Ye shall find"
"Github | Chooons | Site"

machinebacon
Baconator
Posts: 10253
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 11:03 am
Location: Pfälzerwald
Contact:

Re: bauchspeck not a fan of systemd

Unread post by machinebacon » Sat Apr 27, 2013 5:40 pm

dkeg, grab the liquorix and compare. Which kernel version is hot? 3.6-8 (?) and 3.7.x were a bit hotter than 3.8
..gnutella..

User avatar
wuxmedia
Grasshopper
Posts: 6454
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2012 11:32 am
Location: Back in Blighty
Contact:

Re: bauchspeck not a fan of systemd

Unread post by wuxmedia » Sat Apr 27, 2013 5:54 pm

well, the -other- thing was i needed the intel drivers from xorg to make the framebuffer work OOTB, I think it might have nothing to do with systumd not working. 8)
"Seek, and Ye shall find"
"Github | Chooons | Site"

User avatar
dkeg
Configurator
Posts: 3782
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 9:23 pm
Location: Mid-Atlantic Grill

Re: bauchspeck not a fan of systemd

Unread post by dkeg » Sat Apr 27, 2013 9:55 pm

machinebacon wrote:dkeg, grab the liquorix and compare. Which kernel version is hot? 3.6-8 (?) and 3.7.x were a bit hotter than 3.8
hey Jules, running the latest and greatest ... 3.8.9.

After borking and saving my Kielbasa, I ended up figuring out what the culprit was. You know me and my twitter, so searching twitter clients, found and installed hotot. Was actually my second choice after Turpial, but nonetheless, chose Hotot. Back here in Kielbasa, also added in Hotot, and bam, temp went right up. Banged it out and went to Turpial and no problems. Turpial is much better anyway, integrates nicely and uses dunst for notifications.

so @wux, no worries bro, don't let the heat get ya. Funny thing, even in bauchspeck I end up using i3. What's wrong with me.

Work hard; Complain less

machinebacon
Baconator
Posts: 10253
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 11:03 am
Location: Pfälzerwald
Contact:

Re: bauchspeck not a fan of systemd

Unread post by machinebacon » Sun Apr 28, 2013 11:38 am

lol

That's really interesting - does hotot spawn crap in the background? Well, it's in the name after all.

Thanks for the update.
..gnutella..

User avatar
dkeg
Configurator
Posts: 3782
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 9:23 pm
Location: Mid-Atlantic Grill

Re: bauchspeck not a fan of systemd

Unread post by dkeg » Sun Apr 28, 2013 2:28 pm

No background processe, at last that htop showed, only had a single process, however did carryout with it it's own notification system. that's probably the cause.

Yeah my manhood felt threatened anyway so much happier with turpial. And the integration with dunst is a huge plus.

EDIT: pstree had also not shown any abnormalities, just one process for hotot. ZZZZZZZZ ...
Last edited by dkeg on Sun Apr 28, 2013 9:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Work hard; Complain less

machinebacon
Baconator
Posts: 10253
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 11:03 am
Location: Pfälzerwald
Contact:

Re: bauchspeck not a fan of systemd

Unread post by machinebacon » Sun Apr 28, 2013 4:59 pm

Maybe pstree can give a bit more info, though - let the lion sleep :)
..gnutella..

Post Reply