Forum rules
Please supply only the affected package name as title, with bugreport number (bugs.debian.org) or other sources. This feed can be subscribed to and piped into your RSS reader or conky: http://linuxbbq.org/bbs/feed.php?mode=news
-
dkeg
- Configurator
- Posts: 3782
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 9:23 pm
- Location: Mid-Atlantic Grill
Unread post
by dkeg » Sun Aug 24, 2014 1:20 pm
Unknown Multi-Arch type 'no' for package 'libcdio-dev' ...
Doesn't seem to cause any harm at the moment. Annoying though. I just noticed this morning, and seems these reports were also opened this morninig
Code: Select all
W: Unknown Multi-Arch type 'no' for package 'libcdio-dev'
W: Unknown Multi-Arch type 'no' for package 'libiso9660-dev'
W: Unknown Multi-Arch type 'no' for package 'libudf-dev'
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-bugs ... 66244.html
http://osdir.com/ml/general/2014-08/msg41747.html
Work hard; Complain less
-
machinebacon
- Baconator
- Posts: 10253
- Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 11:03 am
- Location: Pfälzerwald
-
Contact:
Unread post
by machinebacon » Sun Aug 24, 2014 1:22 pm
I think you can remove these -dev packages if you don't intend to build something like brasero :D No seriously, these are only needed for building from source.
..gnutella..
-
dkeg
- Configurator
- Posts: 3782
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 9:23 pm
- Location: Mid-Atlantic Grill
Unread post
by dkeg » Sun Aug 24, 2014 2:35 pm
cool .... <purge in progress> ... grrr, what?
Code: Select all
W: Unknown Multi-Arch type 'no' for package 'libcdio-dev'
W: Unknown Multi-Arch type 'no' for package 'libiso9660-dev'
W: Unknown Multi-Arch type 'no' for package 'libudf-dev'
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
» purge libcdio-dev libiso9660-dev libudf-dev
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Package 'libcdio-dev' is not installed, so not removed
Package 'libiso9660-dev' is not installed, so not removed
Package 'libudf-dev' is not installed, so not removed
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
quick check
Code: Select all
» depends libcdio-dev
libcdio-dev
Depends: libcdio13
|Depends: libc6-dev
Depends: <libc-dev>
libc6-dev
|Depends: dpkg
Depends: install-info
maybe remove libc6-dev?
Code: Select all
» purge libc6-dev
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following packages will be REMOVED:
libbz2-dev* libc6-dev* libexpat1-dev* libfontconfig1-dev* libfreetype6-dev*
libid3tag0-dev* libimlib2-dev* libjpeg8-dev* libncurses5-dev* libpng12-dev*
libtiff5-dev* libxft-dev* zlib1g-dev*
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 13 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
After this operation, 31.1 MB disk space will be freed.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
Thanks for your help MB
Work hard; Complain less
-
machinebacon
- Baconator
- Posts: 10253
- Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 11:03 am
- Location: Pfälzerwald
-
Contact:
Unread post
by machinebacon » Sun Aug 24, 2014 6:15 pm
OK I did exactly the same purge right now (by removing the libc6-dev) on an older Sidbang install and survived it ;)
No warranty!
Edit: <solved> for libcdio-dev
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepo ... bug=759109
Source: libcdio
Binary: libcdio-dev libcdio15 libiso9660-dev libiso9660-9 libudf-dev libudf0 libcdio-utils
..gnutella..
-
dkeg
- Configurator
- Posts: 3782
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 9:23 pm
- Location: Mid-Atlantic Grill
Unread post
by dkeg » Sun Aug 24, 2014 11:21 pm
thanks MB, you are correct, seems to be resolved.
Work hard; Complain less