Classic Rock (1969)
Re: Classic Rock (1969)
^ more days than that, sadly. i could do with a proper 69.
All statements are true in some sense, false in some sense, meaningless in some sense, true and false in some sense, true and meaningless in some sense, false and meaningless in some sense, and true and false and meaningless in some sense.
-
- Baconator
- Posts: 10253
- Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 11:03 am
- Location: Pfälzerwald
- Contact:
Re: Classic Rock (1969)
^ i'll wait for you honey ;O
All statements are true in some sense, false in some sense, meaningless in some sense, true and false in some sense, true and meaningless in some sense, false and meaningless in some sense, and true and false and meaningless in some sense.
Re: Classic Rock (1969)
In love with Terry Reid: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oeGiRfKABeM
- wuxmedia
- Grasshopper
- Posts: 6454
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2012 11:32 am
- Location: Back in Blighty
- Contact:
Re: Classic Rock (1969)
This was helping me build serves today:
deep purple - machine head
Later I figured I'd cast it to my vestax from my Chrome audio. I realised I had the album on vinyl. So I thought time to compare and contrast. Quick pause. I once asked my dad why the record I got sounded shit compared to the CD version I owned on the family don't mini unit, which rekindled his audiophile tendancies until he died.
Fast forward to 2020 and I'm listening to the 1972 vinyl picked up at a car bit sale on 1980s decks with 90s pre amp tech...I suppose the needles are firm this millennium :D
honestly I had Chrome cast with normal cables into the line of the vestax and replacement but not mental cables from the technics. Then cross-fade between both sources and I was actually surprised (the eq was set the same the gain was up a touch on the vinyl to get the level up. Anyway
deep purple - machine head
Later I figured I'd cast it to my vestax from my Chrome audio. I realised I had the album on vinyl. So I thought time to compare and contrast. Quick pause. I once asked my dad why the record I got sounded shit compared to the CD version I owned on the family don't mini unit, which rekindled his audiophile tendancies until he died.
Fast forward to 2020 and I'm listening to the 1972 vinyl picked up at a car bit sale on 1980s decks with 90s pre amp tech...I suppose the needles are firm this millennium :D
honestly I had Chrome cast with normal cables into the line of the vestax and replacement but not mental cables from the technics. Then cross-fade between both sources and I was actually surprised (the eq was set the same the gain was up a touch on the vinyl to get the level up. Anyway
- ivanovnegro
- Minister of Truth
- Posts: 5449
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2012 11:12 pm
Re: Classic Rock (1969)
Sounds interesting.
If the equipment is subpar the vinyl will sound shitty. It does not forgive like a CD, especially with dust on top of it and a bad record player. And of course you need good needles and speakers otherwise the vinyl will sound too weak compared to a CD and moderate equipment but I am telling you stuff that you probably know already. :)
Though there are definitely some bad new pressings for the hipster market that sound just awful regardless the equipment.
If the equipment is subpar the vinyl will sound shitty. It does not forgive like a CD, especially with dust on top of it and a bad record player. And of course you need good needles and speakers otherwise the vinyl will sound too weak compared to a CD and moderate equipment but I am telling you stuff that you probably know already. :)
Though there are definitely some bad new pressings for the hipster market that sound just awful regardless the equipment.
- wuxmedia
- Grasshopper
- Posts: 6454
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2012 11:32 am
- Location: Back in Blighty
- Contact:
Re: Classic Rock (1969)
Shure m44-7s on standard 1210s, vestax pmc05 Pro ii. Normal ish cables. If anyone is caring :D both source go through the vestax so. Maybe that's magic